Upcoming Events

Dublin | Anti-War / Imperialism

no events match your query!

New Events

Dublin

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Michael ?Hockey Stick? Mann Ordered To Pay National Review Over $500,000 Sun Jan 12, 2025 11:00 | Richard Eldred
Michael Mann, infamous for his climate "hockey stick" graph, has been ordered to pay over $530,000 in legal fees after spending over a decade trying ? and failing ? to silence National Review through a lawsuit.
The post Michael ?Hockey Stick? Mann Ordered To Pay National Review Over $500,000 appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link NHS?s Tech ?Efficiency? Adds Layers of Inefficiency and Pain Sun Jan 12, 2025 09:00 | Shane McEvoy
In an age where technology promises efficiency, Shane McEvoy's recent encounter with an NHS booking service chatbot paints a very different picture of inefficiency and frustration that is symptomatic of deeper issues.
The post NHS’s Tech ‘Efficiency’ Adds Layers of Inefficiency and Pain appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Cooking the Books: Why You Just Can?t Trust the Annual Bestseller Lists Anymore Sun Jan 12, 2025 07:00 | Steven Tucker
The New York Times Bestseller list is "pure propaganda", says Elon Musk. The newspaper even admitted in court it is "editorial content", not factual. But what about the Sunday Times version? Steven Tucker investigates.
The post Cooking the Books: Why You Just Can’t Trust the Annual Bestseller Lists Anymore appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Sun Jan 12, 2025 01:23 | Will Jones
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political Sat Jan 11, 2025 17:00 | Noah Carl
Science, nominally the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, is at it again. In November, they published an editorial saying that scientists need to be even more political than they already are.
The post Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en

offsite link End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en

offsite link After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en

offsite link Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Seymour Hersch reveals a major US air attack, including nuclear weaponry, is being planned for Iran.

category dublin | anti-war / imperialism | other press author Monday April 10, 2006 02:08author by Margaret Evans Report this post to the editors

"What are they smoking?"

One of the world's best known investigative reporters, Seymour Hersch, is revealing in the next issue of The New Yorker magazine that Bush & co are actively planning a major air attack on Iran and that; one of the military’s initial option plans, as presented to the White House by the Pentagon this winter, calls for the use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, against underground nuclear sites. One target is Iran’s main centrifuge plant, at Natanz, nearly two hundred miles south of Tehran.

BELOW ARE FURTHER EXTRACTS FROM THIS DISTURBING AND LENGHTY REPORT, READ THE FULL McCOY AT "RELATED LINK".

The Bush Administration, while publicly advocating diplomacy has increased clandestine activities inside Iran and intensified planning for a possible major air attack. Current and former American military and intelligence officials said that Air Force planning groups are drawing up lists of targets, and teams of American combat troops have been ordered into Iran, under cover, to collect targeting data and to establish contact with anti-government ethnic-minority groups.

One former defense official, who still deals with sensitive issues for the Bush Administration, told me that the military planning was premised on a belief that “a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government.” He added, “I was shocked when I heard it, and asked myself, ‘What are they smoking?’ ”

A senior Pentagon adviser on the war on terror expressed a similar view. “This White House believes that the only way to solve the problem is to change the power structure in Iran, and that means war,” he said.

Some operations, apparently aimed in part at intimidating Iran, are already under way. American Naval tactical aircraft, operating from carriers in the Arabian Sea, have been flying simulated nuclear-weapons delivery missions—rapid ascending maneuvers known as “over the shoulder” bombing—since last summer, the former official said, within range of Iranian coastal radars.

The attention given to the nuclear option has created serious misgivings inside the offices of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he added, and some officers have talked about resigning. Late this winter, the Joint Chiefs of Staff sought to remove the nuclear option from the evolving war plans for Iran—without success, the former intelligence official said. “The White House said, ‘Why are you challenging this? The option came from you.’ ”

The Europeans are rattled, however, by their growing perception that President Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney believe a bombing campaign will be needed, and that their real goal is regime change. “Everyone is on the same page about the Iranian bomb, but the United States wants regime change,” a European diplomatic adviser told me.
Michel Samaha, a veteran Lebanese Christian politician and former cabinet minister in Beirut, told me that the Iranian retaliation might be focussed on exposed oil and gas fields in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. “They would be at risk,” he said, “and this could begin the real jihad of Iran versus the West. You will have a messy world.”

Related Link: http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/060417fa_fact
author by Terencepublication date Sat Apr 29, 2006 02:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski has spoken out strongly against the current lunatic plan to attack Iran. Brzezinski, who served under Carter and has been part of the establishment higher echelons for a long time is no dove for he is credited with drawing the Soviets into Afghanistan to give what Brzezinski famously said -'the Soviets their own Vietnam'.

Brzezinski is very much part of big Capital. His concern about the attack would not be about the humane side of it, but more about his strategic concerns and how it would make things even more difficult as evidenced by his comments quoted here:


2. Likely Iranian reactions would significantly compound ongoing U.S. difficulties in Iraq and in Afghanistan, perhaps precipitate new violence by Hezbollah in Lebanon, and in all probability cause the United States to become bogged down in regional violence for a decade or more to come. Iran is a country of some 70 million people and a conflict with it would make the misadventure in Iraq look trivial.

3. Oil prices would climb steeply, especially if the Iranians cut their production and seek to disrupt the flow of oil from the nearby Saudi oil fields. The world economy would be severely impacted, with America blamed for it. Note that oil prices have already shot above $70 per barrel, in part because of fears of a U.S./Iran clash.


As he points out, Iran has only enriched a minute amount of Uranium, just a few grams. To make a bomb they would need 10 or 20 kilos which would take a long time and even then there would still be much to do. Here is how he opens his Op Ed piece:

Iran's announcement that it has enriched a minute amount of uranium has unleashed urgent calls for a preventive U.S. air strike by the same sources that earlier urged war on Iraq.

If there is another terrorist attack in the United States, you can bet your bottom dollar that there will be also immediate charges that Iran was responsible in order to generate public hysteria in favor of military action.

But there are four compelling reasons against a preventive air attack on Iranian nuclear facilities....


You can find the full editorial opinion piece at the URL below. It's worth acquainting yourself with this guy.

Related Link: http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/04/25/opinion/edzbig.php
author by Barry - 32csmpublication date Sun Apr 30, 2006 05:24author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The US empire is being led by crazy people . And like every empire before it it will crash and burn in flames . Maybe good advic for workers , oppressed people and the like would be stock up with guns and stuff and be ready to rise from the ashes of its defeat . Because it surely will be defeated and tear itself apart . Nothing surer . Nero was an arrogant powerful and cowardly man riven with personal neuroses and full of hate - just like Americas rulers today . It will fall and bring the parasite regimes which clin to it crashimg down too .
Fair play to Iran for standin up to it . They have the right attitude completely .

author by Mr. T.publication date Mon May 01, 2006 00:38author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Fair play to Iran? For what - for threatening to deply nukes? Fuck that - standing up to the US shouldn't put the very existance of the planet in jeapardy. Trusting Iran with nukes is as intelligent as trusting a blind drunk to drive a car.

It's sickening to read so many so called leftists and progressives applaud Iran - a belligerent, backwards theocracy that would be extinct were it not for their oil reserves. Reminds one of the so called leftists and anarchists who supported Hitler before he invaded Poland.

author by blaisepublication date Tue May 02, 2006 04:04author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Iran has as much right to a nuclear arsenal as the United States or Israel or the United States of Israel has to such weaponry. The branding of the leaders of Iran as crazy - as crazy as who - as Bush - as Sharon or Netanyahua? I am tired of this branding of Islamic leaders as crazy. The best thing the United States could do is ignore the soap box rhethoric of the Iranian leader, but Ahmadinejad can ill afford to ignore the wild grandstanding of the American president, because as we all know, Bush, as he did with Iraq, is more than capable of making a terrible mistake. The deposing of Sadam Hussain was actually a large mistake which has tumbled that country into chaos. A secular country, which it was, is now highly sectarian, its infrastructure destroyed, open sewers everywhere, and no sign of a remedy on the horizon. Rumsfield will go down in history along with Tommy Franks as two of the worst battle leaders ever. Cheney has deceipt and greed written all over him with his contractual arrangments to rebuild a country which he assisted in destroying. The Americans are intent on erasing ancient history because theirs is so young and I believe it's plain jealousy which fires their destructive engine. Have you ever heard the typical American soldier in the streets of Iraq. They generally have no sense of history, of where they are, or who Iraquis are. Do they realize that the sector they are propping us are in league with the Iranian leaders who they are told are crazy.

author by Noelpublication date Tue May 02, 2006 17:00author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Have you ever heard the typical American soldier in the streets of Iraq. They generally have no sense of history, of where they are, or who Iraquis are.

Got a link for that?

author by pat cpublication date Tue May 02, 2006 19:30author address author phone Report this post to the editors

You shouldnt take wikipedia seriously for either historical or political research. so mussolini was a former socialist, thats not news. many fascisti were former conservatives or recruited from lumpen elements the same is true for germany. you will find very few on indymedia that support stalin or his pact with hitler. a few do but they have no support or credibility.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy