Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Net Zero ?Nudge Unit? That Deployed Scare Tactics in Covid Will Push Heat Pumps on Public Thu Jan 02, 2025 15:33 | Will Jones
A Net Zero 'nudge unit' that used scare tactics during the Covid pandemic has received a ?100,000 contract from the Government to encourage the public to take up heat pumps.
The post Net Zero ‘Nudge Unit’ That Deployed Scare Tactics in Covid Will Push Heat Pumps on Public appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Britain?s New Class Divide: Those With Driveways and Those Without Thu Jan 02, 2025 13:14 | Sallust
With the cost of charging an EV at a public station now way higher than petrol, Britain has a new class divide: those with driveways and those without. It's a divide that Labour is making worse.
The post Britain’s New Class Divide: Those With Driveways and Those Without appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Elon Musk: Jess Phillips Deserves to Be in Prison Over Labour Refusal to Launch Grooming Gangs Inqui... Thu Jan 02, 2025 11:13 | Will Jones
Elon Musk has said Jess Phillips "deserves to be in prison" over Labour's refusal to hold a public inquiry into?historic sexual abuse?by grooming gangs in Oldham.
The post Elon Musk: Jess Phillips Deserves to Be in Prison Over Labour Refusal to Launch Grooming Gangs Inquiry appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Do Admissions Counsellors Discriminate in Favour of Woke Applicants? Thu Jan 02, 2025 09:00 | Noah Carl
A study has found that admissions counsellors at U.S. colleges are more likely to respond to emails that include preferred pronouns. This suggests they are discriminating in favour of woke applicants.
The post Do Admissions Counsellors Discriminate in Favour of Woke Applicants? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Ghosts Of Christmas Future: How Long Until Islamic Exorcisms Are Free on the NHS? Thu Jan 02, 2025 07:00 | Steven Tucker
With the prestigious Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine suggesting exploring the role of "djinn possession" in mental health disorders, how long until Islamic exorcisms are free on the NHS, asks Steven Tucker.
The post Ghosts Of Christmas Future: How Long Until Islamic Exorcisms Are Free on the NHS? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en
How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en
Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to his Depar... Mon Dec 16, 2024 13:26 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?112 Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:34 | en
Voltaire Network >>
international |
anti-war / imperialism |
other press
Wednesday August 20, 2008 18:27
by Y
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4The Mark Almond speech is v. funny.
Visiting a Georgian prison Almond expressed concern to the prison governor at the possibility that political prisoners may have been tortured.
"Don't worry," he was told, "We beat everyone who comes here. We make no distinctions!"
If nuclear missiles can be shot down and destroyed before they reach their targets then it makes them obsolete.
it makes it illogical for states to possess nuclear weapons and its makes it illogical to maintain ruinously expensive nuclear programs.
It makes nuclear war in the 21st century less likely and means that in future cities will not be reduced to sheets of glass.
Your pseudo-logic impresses me, Dave.
Your statements, Dave, are logical ONLY if both sides possess the same or similar capabilities in 'missile defence', ... Dave.
Otherwise they make no sense, Dave. Not since the '60's, Dave, has Russia sought to place missiles in the US's backyard.
Indeed they are a recipe for certain 'first strike' reaction at some point in the future, Dave.
Many people, ( maybe you as well, Dave?) were suckered into believing that the US would change it's belligerent stance towards Russia IF ONLY Russia would 'play by Western rules'. The Russians attempted to do that for about 10 years. and then when they surveyed the wreckage of their country after 10 years of Western imposed 'disaster Capitalism' they made a decision to stop listening to western economic 'experts' and decided to retake the industries stolen by the Oligarchs. This is the grave sin of the Russians.
The US and NATO seek a massive pre-emptive advantage under the guise of protecting from the 'Russian Menace', Dave.
The Russian Menace, Dave, is however a reaction TO the NATO moves, not the cause of them.
Dave? I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do
If it were the it would be sufficient to place it with the US's own borders.
Why must it be placed on the Russian borders?
And who is to say it won't have offensive capabilities.
Essentially, anyone that claims the US is not trying to restart a Cold war/arms race with the Russians has to answer the question
"What the fuck are are the Yanks doing pointing extra missiles at the Russians in their own backyard? Was there a shortage of missiles that suddenly needed rectifing?"